NET ZERO IN AUSTRALIA

THE HIDDEN HAND BEHIND THE CLIMATE CURTAIN

Introduction: The Climate Mirage

In the quiet paddocks of regional Australia and the buzzing halls of Parliament alike, an invisible web is being woven. It is sold as the salvation of the planet, cloaked in green language and urgent appeals. “Net Zero by 2050” has become the catchcry of a new global religion. But beneath its virtuous appearance lies a technocratic restructuring of society, economy, and land use, one that has arrived in Australia largely without the informed consent of her people.

What many Australians don’t realise is that Net Zero is not a neutral goal. It is a globalist mechanism of control. It leverages climate anxiety to centralise governance, override democratic debate and erode the sovereign rights of nations and individuals alike. In Australia, the consequences are already rippling through farming communities, regional towns and everyday households. Yet, few understand where this policy came from, who benefits, or how far-reaching its implications will be.

This essay seeks to expose the machinery behind Net Zero; its architects, its political facilitators, its creeping timeline and to honour those Australians who are beginning to awaken to what is being done in their name.

Who Is Behind the Net Zero Agenda?

The Net Zero movement is a coordinated international strategy. It has not emerged from grassroots Australian farmers or Indigenous communities but from elite transnational organisations including:

The World Economic Forum (WEF): Through its “Great Reset” initiative, the WEF has promoted Net Zero as a restructuring of global capitalism to achieve “climate equity.” In truth, this is a consolidation of power among corporate and banking elites.

The United Nations (UN) and its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): these bodies have established the frameworks that pressure nations to conform to global emissions targets.

International central banks and financial institutions like BlackRock, Vanguard, and Goldman Sachs have poured trillions into ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) metrics creating a profit incentive for “green” transitions that are anything but regenerative.

Climate advisory firms and consultancies, such as McKinsey & Co., and Deloitte, have profited handsomely by steering government policy under the guise of “climate strategy.”

Australia is merely one node in this wider network. The policies being rolled out here mirror those in Europe, Canada, and New Zealand countries bound by Five Eyes intelligence cooperation and deep globalist alignment.

The Objective: Global Governance Through Green Control

At its core, Net Zero is not about reducing emissions. It is about remapping the world’s power structures.

Its true objectives include:

• Centralising land use under government and corporate control by regulating or restricting farming, forestry and private property in the name of “emissions reduction.”

• Collapsing small-to-medium enterprises (including farms and family businesses) while favouring carbon-compliant global mega-corporations.

• Digitising identification and control systems: Carbon credits, social credit scoring and digital ID will be the infrastructure for compliance in the Net Zero economy.

• Redirecting public funds away from communities and into massive subsidies for renewables, carbon trading schemes and smart city infrastructure owned by foreign multinationals.

  
  

Net Zero is the spiritual successor to Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. It cloaks neo-feudalism in ecological virtue. It weaponises climate narratives to achieve what no empire or invasion could: total submission of national sovereignty to unelected global forces.

Timeline of Implementation in Australia

The insidious rollout of Net Zero in Australia can be traced through these key developments:

2007–2010: Introduction of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme under Rudd/Gillard government. Despite backlash, it sets the stage.

2015: Paris Climate Agreement signed. Australia pledges emissions reduction targets aligning with Net Zero long-term goals.

2016–2018: Malcolm Turnbull promotes climate initiatives and begins deeper integration with WEF-backed frameworks.

2018: Australian Rain Technologies (ART) connected to cloud seeding programs raises public suspicion as Turnbull’s government indirectly channels funding.

2021: Prime Minister Scott Morrison announces Australia’s Net Zero commitment by 2050 at COP26 without holding a referendum or full democratic debate.

2021–2023: Farmers begin facing land restrictions, biodiversity offset programs, and sustainability compliance mechanisms.

2024 onward: Widespread installation of renewable energy zones (REZs), including high-voltage transmission lines across farmland and national parks against local resistance.

2025–2030: Gradual implementation of digital ID and smart city infrastructure, connected to carbon tracking. Surveillance of livestock emissions under trial in various sectors.

This rollout has been stealthy, bureaucratic and technocratic avoiding public scrutiny wherever possible.

Weather Modification & Climate Engineering: Manufacturing Consent

To justify Net Zero policies, governments must convince the public that climate change is a clear and present danger. While industrial pollution and ecological degradation are undeniable, the manipulation of weather patterns to accelerate public fear is a hidden tool rarely discussed.

One of the most troubling elements of this hidden hand is weather modification technology, used under the banner of “climate mitigation” but, in truth, potentially engineering the very crises it claims to prevent.

In Australia, weather modification has a deep history:

Australian Rain Technologies (ART), founded by Rupert Murdoch’s nephew Matt Handbury, received $10 million in grants from the Turnbull government. These grants were provided under the pretext of drought relief and rain enhancement yet the public was never informed about the full extent of weather experimentation.

Handbury’s company experimented with ionisation technology, a form of non-chemical geoengineering, raising serious ethical concerns about weather sovereignty and the health of ecosystems affected by these programs.

The Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) and CSIRO have long studied cloud seeding, artificial rainfall, and ionospheric manipulation. Yet, no national referendum or ethical consultation was held with Australians.

These interventions raise profound spiritual and ecological questions: Who gave permission to alter the sky? What natural balances have been disrupted? If governments and corporations can create floods or droughts, are they also staging the conditions to justify the Net Zero takeover of land and agriculture?

Weather modification, in this context, becomes a tool of manufactured consent—conditioning Australians to believe they are facing unstoppable climate disaster, while quietly introducing control measures that erode national autonomy.

The Liberal–National Coalition’s Role

The Liberal–National Coalition has played a pivotal role in facilitating the Net Zero agenda, despite its traditional image as a “conservative” protector of rural communities and industries.

Malcolm Turnbull: The Globalist Within

As Prime Minister (2015–2018), Malcolm Turnbull was instrumental in aligning Australia with the globalist Net Zero agenda.

Turnbull, a former Goldman Sachs banker, attended World Economic Forum meetings and championed the Paris Agreement. He was also deeply connected to climate tech circles, using his influence to direct grants to ART for rainmaking experiments.

He later became Chair of the International Hydropower Association, supporting massive renewable schemes often constructed on traditional or agricultural land.

Turnbull’s legacy is one of deepening Australia’s ties to foreign climate policy directives while undermining domestic food sovereignty and water rights.

Barnaby Joyce & the Nationals: Wolves in Akubras?

Despite strong rhetoric in defense of farmers, the National Party under Barnaby Joyce has quietly enabled the Net Zero framework:

Joyce publicly opposed Net Zero at various times, but voted with the Coalition to fund key climate infrastructure and regulatory changes tied to emissions reduction.

Under his leadership, Nationals helped oversee the rollout of Renewable Energy Zones (REZs), where foreign-backed wind and solar farms now displace traditional farming communities.

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan, facilitated during National Party governance, redistributed water rights under market-based mechanisms, favouring corporate agribusiness and further disempowering family farmers.

Despite being positioned as a “voice for the bush,” the Nationals have too often spoken with a forked tongue simultaneously appealing to rural voters while participating in their dispossession.

Regional Australians & Farmers: The Frontline of Impact

The impact of Net Zero on regional Australia is both immediate and long-term and devastating in its implications.

1. Land Access and Use Restrictions

Farmers are increasingly bound by new regulations and compliance schemes including:

Biodiversity offset programs that prevent full use of private land

Mandatory emissions tracking for livestock (especially methane from cattle)

Zoning changes that allow renewable developers access to land previously protected

2. Loss of Water Sovereignty

Water trading, basin schemes and hydropower projects tied to Net Zero reduce the capacity of family farms to irrigate and plan long-term.

Rainfall is increasingly erratic partly due to climate and possibly to geoengineering, creating uncertainty and dependency.

3. Transmission Infrastructure & Land Grabs

Massive high-voltage lines are being built across farms without proper compensation or ecological review, disrupting operations and spiritual relationships with Country.

4. Financial Pressures & Carbon Markets

Farmers are being courted into carbon trading schemes that require them to sell their rights to emit or clear land.

Once enrolled, they become beholden to ESG financiers and digital reporting requirements effectively enslaved to a technocratic bureaucracy.

What is being presented as an “opportunity” for farmers is, in truth, a slow-motion dispossession, where the ability to feed the nation is handed over to multinational energy companies, asset managers, and unelected carbon boards.

Globalist Corporations Driving the Agenda

A powerful web of corporate actors is behind the Net Zero push in Australia:

1. BlackRock & Vanguard: These investment giants control billions in energy, agriculture, and real estate assets. They are the largest shareholders in companies implementing Net Zero infrastructure, including BHP, Rio Tinto, AGL, and Origin Energy.

2. Macquarie Group: Deeply embedded in climate finance, Macquarie has major stakes in solar, wind, and water infrastructure. It benefits from privatised water and land transitions under the climate agenda.

3. Global Consultancies: McKinsey, Boston Consulting Group, and PwC are paid millions to “advise” governments on how to achieve Net Zero while simultaneously profiting from climate data services and transition financing.

4. Tech & Surveillance Giants: Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, and Google are partnering with Australian agencies to build smart grids and carbon data platforms setting the stage for digital ID and carbon credit compliance.

5. The World Economic Forum: Through its partners and public-private networks, WEF directs the overall narrative shaping what governments say and do via climate narratives of scarcity and “sustainability.”

These are not Australian companies. They do not answer to the bush, the earth, or the people. They answer to their global boards and stakeholders and to a vision of the future where the individual is surveilled, taxed, and restrained under the guise of “saving the planet.”

The Green New Deal: Trojan Horse of Technocracy

While the Green New Deal is often promoted as a progressive response to climate change, promising clean energy jobs and environmental protection, in reality it serves as the economic blueprint of the global Net Zero technocracy.

Originally popularised in the United States and adopted in Europe and international climate forums, the Green New Deal rebrands carbon control as social justice while quietly advancing centralised state control, data surveillance, and financialisation of nature.

1. The Origins and Promoters

Championed by figures like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and UN Climate Envoys, the Green New Deal claims to tackle inequality and climate change simultaneously. It has received endorsement or funding support from institutions such as the UN, WEF, IMF, and World Bank, despite its supposed "anti-capitalist" stance.

2. The Mechanism

The Green New Deal calls for massive public investment in renewable energy, infrastructure, housing retrofits, and green jobs.

But who profits? Often, it’s not communities. It’s global engineering firms, tech companies, and ESG-backed hedge funds.

Land and natural resources are reclassified as carbon assets which can be traded, taxed, or restricted under new laws.

3. The Technocratic Trap

Under the Green New Deal model, every aspect of life becomes subject to carbon accounting: what you eat, where you travel how much water or energy you use.

This is the beginning of a totalised “green credit” system, where compliance with environmental goals determines access to finance, education, services, or even freedom of movement.

4. Global Alignment with Net Zero

The Green New Deal is the cultural face of Net Zero giving it a progressive sheen, while the core mechanisms remain extractive and authoritarian.

In Australia, though it has not been named “Green New Deal” publicly, the policy platforms of Net Zero mirror its structure, including:

• Job creation in “transition sectors” (while destroying agricultural livelihoods)

• Renewable infrastructure subsidies (benefiting global financiers)

• Carbon capture and offset schemes (undermining food and land security)

5. Why It Matters in Australia

As Net Zero policies escalate, Australians may soon see the rollout of more overt “Green Deal” programs—especially under Labor or WEF-aligned leadership.

These may offer short-term grants, climate jobs, or cash incentives, while in reality binding communities to digital compliance systems and sacrificing long-term sovereignty.

The Net Zero Agenda and the Rise of the Anti-Christ System

Behind the sterile language of emissions, sustainability and carbon credits lies a darker truth: Net Zero is not simply a policy. It is the gateway to a totalitarian system cloaked in environmental virtue. It is the cover story for a new global order that seeks to erase God’s image from the Earth, restructure society through artificial intelligence and enslave humanity within a digital cage.

This is not hyperbole. It is the anti-Christ infrastructure spoken of in prophecy, disguised as progress. Let us name its elements:

1. Smart Cities and 15-Minute Zones

Promoted as climate-friendly innovations, Smart Cities are in fact surveillance hubs where every movement, purchase, and interaction is monitored via facial recognition, QR codes, and AI.

15-minute cities, sold as walkable urban planning, are the early infrastructure of digital containment, where movement will eventually require biometric or carbon-based permissions.

These cities will be integrated with digital identity, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and social scoring systems based on ESG compliance not human freedom.

2. Digital Prisons and Carbon Compliance

Under Net Zero, every citizen becomes a carbon emitter to be tracked, taxed and potentially restricted.

Your personal carbon footprint will be linked to a digital ID, which is being quietly introduced across Australia under MyGov, Medicare and Digital Wallet systems.

What appears as convenience is the architecture of control: a soft prison where freedom is exchanged for access.

3. The Age of Endless Viruses and Forced Vaccinations

Net Zero and pandemic response strategies have become twins, two wings of the same beast. Each “emergency” justifies greater bio-surveillance, state overreach, and experimental intervention.

The so-called climate-health nexus is being promoted by the WEF, WHO, and Gates Foundation arguing that climate change will cause more pandemics, justifying ongoing global lockdown systems.

mRNA technology, initially used in COVID-19 vaccines, is now being developed for climate-linked threats (e.g. “livestock vaccines” to reduce methane), making gene editing and biological modification the new norm.

This is not health. It is transhumanism: the reprogramming of God’s creation at the molecular level, in the name of "science."

4. Transhumanism: The Final Desecration

Net Zero’s deeper purpose is not just the control of carbon. It is the control of consciousness.

Globalist figures like Yuval Noah Harari openly speak of humans as “hackable animals,” and AI as the new source of truth. This worldview views the soul as obsolete and nature as something to be digitised and dominated.

The long-term goal is a merger of biology and machine—where human beings are no longer sovereign creations of God but programmable units in a technocratic hive.

5. A Spiritual Crisis: The False Covenant

This is the false covenant warned of in scripture, a counterfeit kingdom offering peace, equality, and safety but leading to soul death and physical enslavement.

It is rooted not in divine stewardship of the Earth but in Luciferian inversion: turning God’s garden into a surveilled plantation, reducing His children to data points.

The Net Zero agenda thus serves as the entry point into the Beast System; a system where:

• Nature is commodified

• Bodies are genetically altered

• Minds are algorithmically shaped

• Lives are measured by artificial metrics

• God is removed from governance, creation, and human identity.

  
  

The Call: Return to the Divine Blueprint

We were not created for this.

We are children of the Most High created in the image of God, entrusted with the care of the Earth, bound not to carbon credits but to sacred covenant.

It is time to remember:

• The Earth is not in crisis—it is being attacked.

• Humanity is not the problem—we are the target.

• Climate change is not the root—it is the rationale.

  
  

The divine blueprint calls us back to:

• Natural Law rooted in love, relationship and sacred stewardship

• Local autonomy, not global technocratic control

• Biological integrity, not genetic tampering

• Holy communion with nature, not digital mediation

• 
  

This is not just a political battle. It is a spiritual war and Australia, beloved land of the Dreaming, is one of its frontlines.

Conclusion: Sovereignty or Surrender?

Net Zero is not just a policy. It is a global reset of who owns land, who controls food and who has the right to live freely. It bypasses democratic process, manipulates emotion and exploits genuine ecological concerns for an entirely different agenda.

Australians must now ask:

• Who gave permission for our skies to be tampered with?

• Who benefits from the collapse of small farming?

• Why are policies affecting landholders made by people who have never worked the soil?

• 
  

If the answer is foreign bankers, tech oligarchs and globalist bureaucrats then we are not living in a democracy.

This is the hour to awaken, to reclaim land, food and water sovereignty and to return to right relationship with Creation. Let those with eyes to see recognise the Net Zero agenda for what it is: a Trojan Horse cloaked in green, sent to disarm a nation and place it under technocratic rule.

Additional research:

A Wrong Kind of Green (www.wrongkindofgreen.org)

The Light Australia (www.thelightaustralia.com)

Did You Know (www.didyouknow.ink)

Stop Net Zero (www.StopNetZero.org)